We rely on members to let us know when posts contain content that violiate the
community guidelines. The most common reason that content gets flagged is that it contains dehumanizing or trolling/baiting text. Getting too many flagged posts will result in account termination.
12 comments
I'm more interested in the canvas
π
Nice very nice very provocative
It looks tacky and cheap unless you're on a bike or on a stage pole.... IMO
A little ink that can be covered is fine, but all that looks Nasty - to ME. Not a judgement of the person, they just look like prison ink....
Tattoos don't tend to scare me. I don't like an over abundance of them. I'm more interested in why you got them and what the story is behind them. Gives me a bigger picture of who you are.
First I want to say nice pic. To answer your question, to me I like both. Meaning women with tattoos and without. So to get a little deeper into the question I'll say I woman without tattoos in my opinion has the advantage overall. What I mean by that is compared only off of looks without anything communication. I can look and appreciate the curves, can imagine fucking, imagine dating, and imagine marriage. With a woman with tattoos it's easy to appreciate the curves and some of the tats, easy to imagine hot wild fucking, then without any communication it gets fuzzy. When I see most tattoos I see pain or stories that they forever want to remember. Which could be good or bad but to avoid a potential headache I would go with the one without tats. Now someone I've known for a long time and know the thought process and meaning behind the tattoos then of course it changes everything, even just communication changes everything. Most people I know with tats are super cool. Some I know are scarred. I hope this helps to see things from one of many perspectives.
I don't think it's JUST that a woman with lots of body art looks "tough" or "rough" although that is a factor.
Im fairly indifferent about women with lots of body art. I don't think they take away from her looks but I don't think they add much either. If having lots of body art makes her more confident, then THAT'S what makes her more attractive to me... the confidence, not her ink.
Thing is, if I see a woman with lots of body art, I usually assume that she's looking for a guy with the same look. My look is more clean-cut and in my mind, probably not what she's looking for.
I know that sometimes opposites attract but that's the exception not the rule. It's just more common for people to look for others with a similar look. Its kinda like an extremely fit woman most likely wanting to be with a fit guy. That way they know they have things in common, stuff to talk about, interest in the same types of music and a desire to visit the same establishments. Etc etc
People shouldn't make assumptions (I know I make a lot) about people just based on their looks but with looks being the first thing you notice, that can be kinda difficult.
It is unfortunate but true, that when you have a specific look, you alienate yourself from those that don't share in that look... I always thought, (at least in part) that people did it that way for that reason...
Love the abstract nature of your tats, very cool.
Body art is great on a female . Problem with age and skin stretching is loses its appeal as ones gets older. maybe needs a touch up every 5 years.
When tastefully done and without ALL the colors of a rainbow β splashed everywhere β those tats can definitely work. π
I can see your point, about being scary. I'll blame the movies and media for that perception. Although, I've been up real close with tattooed biker-gals, and they can be.
Yep... you like to show-off yours: I like them. π
I think itβs sexy as hell